In a significant and controversial move, South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster signed into law a ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors on Tuesday. This law positions South Carolina as the 25th state to restrict or outright ban such medical care for individuals under 18. The governor’s social media announcement of the decision sparked immediate reactions from a number of advocacy groups and the transgender community.
The new legislation prohibits health professionals from performing gender-transition surgeries, prescribing puberty blockers, and overseeing hormone treatments for minors. Additionally, it mandates that school principals or vice principals must inform parents or guardians if a child wishes to use a name or pronouns that do not match their sex assigned at birth.
While the bill includes allowances for mental health counselors to discuss these treatments and suggest legal alternatives elsewhere, the impact is substantial. The law takes effect immediately, prompting groups like the Campaign for Southern Equality to mobilize resources to help families seek care outside South Carolina and its neighboring states with similar bans.
RELATED: South Carolina’s Debate Over the “Help not Harm” Transgender Bill
Reactions from the LGBTQ+ Community
The reaction from the LGBTQ+ community has been swift and vehement. Raymond Velazquez, Executive Director of the Uplift Outreach Center, expressed profound disappointment and concern:
“Healthcare is a human right – and it breaks my heart to see lawmakers rip away life-affirming and often life-saving medical care from transgender youth in South Carolina. No one should be forced to leave their home state to access the care that they need and deserve.”
Cristina Picozzi, Executive Director of the Harriet Hancock Center, echoed this sentiment by highlighting the inherent dignity and worth of transgender people:
“To all of the young people in South Carolina and their parents who are reading this news and feeling fear for the future, please know: No law can change the fact that you are worthy of dignity, equality, joy, and respect.”
Governor McMaster’s Justification
Governor McMaster defended the law as a measure to protect young people from making irreversible decisions before they are adults. He stated, “If they want to make those decisions later, when they’re adults, then that’s a different story, but we must protect our young people from irreversible decisions.”
This perspective has garnered support from certain groups that argue that such medical treatments can have long-term consequences. However, these assertions are often based on unpublished or disputed data, contrasting sharply with established medical research and the testimonies of healthcare professionals and affected families.
Medical professionals and researchers have long argued that gender-affirming care can be lifesaving for transgender youth. Extensive consultations precede the commencement of any medical treatment, ensuring that it is in the best interest of the young person’s mental and physical health. Studies consistently show that transgender youth face increased risks of stress, depression, and suicidal behavior when denied the ability to live as their true selves.
Dr. Elizabeth Mack, president of the South Carolina chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, highlighted the rarity of such cases, noting there are “less than 2,000 trans kids in the state.” She, along with many in the medical community, testified against the bill, emphasizing the positive impact of gender-affirming care on the lives of transgender youth.
Legal and Social Implications
The law also includes provisions that could force the outing of transgender students in schools, potentially placing them in harmful situations if their families are not supportive. This aspect of the legislation has drawn significant criticism for its potential to endanger vulnerable youth.
Jace Woodrum, Executive Director of ACLU South Carolina, criticized the law for infringing on personal freedoms and inserting political agendas into healthcare decisions:
“We can put to rest the notion that the government cares about limited government and personal freedom. With a stroke of a pen, he (McMaster) has chosen to insert the will of politicians into healthcare decisions, trample on the liberties of trans South Carolinians, and deny the rights of the parents of trans minors.”
South Carolina’s legislation aligns it with a growing number of states enacting similar bans, primarily concentrated in the South and Midwest. With Virginia now the lone Southern state without such a ban, access to gender-affirming care in the region is becoming increasingly limited.
The broader implications of these laws are significant, impacting not only the immediate well-being of transgender youth but also setting a precedent for the treatment of LGBTQ+ individuals nationwide. Advocacy groups are preparing to challenge the law in court, seeking to uphold the rights and dignity of transgender individuals.
The Bottom Line
For the transgender community in South Carolina and beyond, the path forward is fraught with challenges. However, the resilience and solidarity of this community, coupled with the support of allies and advocacy groups, provide a beacon of hope.
Storm Scites, a transgender man from Horry County, poignantly captured the sentiment of many:
“This is somebody’s last straw. This is telling somebody that who they are is wrong.”
In the face of adversity, the message remains clear: transgender individuals are worthy of dignity, respect, and the freedom to live authentically. The fight for these fundamental rights continues, with the unwavering belief that justice and equality will ultimately prevail.
